home | what's new | other sites | contact | about

Word Gems

self-knowledge, authentic living, full humanity, continual awakening

Soulmate, Myself:
Omega Point

return to Part 2

E. I was lying in bed… wanting to sleep after my work today – I’m doing research on 100 medieval Troubadour poems, I won’t go into that now… but I couldn’t calm down.

K. What are you thinking, Elenchus?

E. I feel I shouldn’t even talk about it. We’ve had several good discussions now, and the beginnings of a good meeting of the minds… and so why should I undermine that with a concern that – I know – is of the ego, and really has no merit?

K. But you are bothered by it, so wouldn’t it be best to talk about it?

E. I don’t want to ruin things.

K. But your spirit won’t calm down, so there is some aspect of “ruin” that wants to be addressed. What are you thinking?

E. I was thinking about the problem that bedeviled Byron and Gibran and Goethe –

K. The problem of forgiving a wayward lover “even into eternity.”

E. I feel bad that I am bothered by this. You’re doing what you can to set things right… but…

K. But… the memories of the past weigh on you.

E. I can’t seem to shake my malaise… I didn’t think that forgiving the person I love most in life would be so hard.

K. May I ask… which of the bad things of the past haunt you the most?

E. It’s what those three writers said… it’s what feels like betrayal.

K. As they explained in their poetry, it’s a wound that, feels like, will not be healed “even into eternity.”

E. As I lay in bed, I asked myself – What is the real issue here? Why can’t I just put this aside and accept your words of wanting to have “us”. And then I saw – in my spirit – the disturbing reason: I don’t trust you. I don’t really believe that you wouldn’t be hurtful again. I expect you to go to some other guy and be spiteful and try to disrespect me… I don’t trust you… and if trust is a problem, then how can I build my life around you?

K. (sighing) When we are young, and even in recent years, it’s easy to be defiant, like “I’ll be happy with someone else,” and act like the one person you care about doesn’t exist. That’s the hubris. And then later, when you want to make things right, the horror is, so much hurt was caused that now he’s questioning whether he will – ever – take a chance on you again. And it doesn’t matter if he thinks you’re the most beautiful girl in the world – that doesn’t matter an atom – if he sees you as untrustworthy, and not the kind of girl he’d want to build his life with.

E. (silence)

K. What should we do, Elenchus?

E. I don’t want to do anything stupid – I still want to work toward being together… but I’m having trouble getting my feelings in line. Our problem is – we can’t just go out and be with another. That won’t work. We have a soul bond, and there’ll be no authentic marriage with just another pretty face. If we try – as we did in the past – we’re just going to invite more suffering into our lives. Each of us, each to the other, cannot be with any other. And that’s a problem.

K. I thought it was a blessing, but if trust is an issue, how do we move forward?

E. (sighing) It’s late at night, things always seem worse late at night, I shouldn’t have even brought it up.

K. It’s just as well that you did, because you’ve talked about this before, and it hasn’t gone away.

E. One thing, we’re not getting married tomorrow. It’s still years away, we’re not even in Summerland yet. We have time to talk about this and try to find healing. It’s a “level of consciousness” thing. I’ve written about this for years, not a matter of will power to forgive, or a decision, it has to be grown into.

K. That almost makes it worse because we can’t just decide to make it go away.

E. We have time to sort this out.

K. I feel bad about this, Elenchus. I did it to myself. This goes all the way back to early high school when I insulted you, and thought I could just go out with someone else, do whatever I pleased with no consequences, and retaliate for your rejection of me – which you never did -- and now it threatens our life of love. (deeply sighing)

E. I don’t want to make this into a big problem.

K. But it sort of is a problem, isn’t it. I mean, if tomorrow were our wedding day, you’d be hesitating, wouldn’t you.

E. (sighing) And that makes me feel bad, because you’re the only girl I’ve ever truly loved, and the only girl I want to be with…

K. But you feel you can’t now.

E. We shouldn’t make any big pronouncements when we’re agitated, especially late at night. There’s nothing truly wrong between us, it’s an ego thing, and the ego can be overcome. I think we need to make this problem a kind of opportunity to study the deception of the ego more closely – because this is not the only thing the ego will ever try to do to us, and we need to learn how to deal with it.

K. Is this a word of hope for us?

E. Of course. I firmly believe that one day we will be married – I have certainty about this – but we need to grow spiritually to solve this problem.

 **********************************

K. Elenchus… I have an idea… we’re talking about healing the mind of past trauma. I’m wondering if that principle from the Kama Sutra could help us – you know, about giving each other what is wanted.

E. How do you see it?

K. My theory is – if I can give you what you want, then your deeper person will begin to have a new image of me, and begin to trust in me. When I say “give you what you want,” I mean, for right now, a kind of therapy of speaking to you. When we lie together, touching foreheads, and touching hands, I think it might heal you if I could whisper to you the things that I want to give you when we’re married. These whispered things of love would be what you yourself want, they’d be things that specifically define happiness according to your definition of happiness. You will tell me what you want. I would whisper these things to you, promise them to you, in minute detail, and keep on repeating the exact things you want and how I will give them to you. I believe that there could be great therapeutic aid in this kind of whispering. And, again, you must tell me exactly what you want, and imagine the receipt of these things, as I would pledge, over and over, to give you exactly those things that you want. I think this could melt the hardness of the ego and its deceptions. I think you would begin to dare to trust me -- on the emotional level, not on the analytical/rational side, which is ok -- but with this kind of therapeutic pledge of blessings to come, we can find our healing of battered emotions and feelings.

E. I think this has real merit.

K. Elenchus, there’s another aspect to “the whispering” that can also support healing. In addition to affirming what I might offer you for your happiness, I would also like to whisper – a kind of plea making – explanations concerning why I did what I did back then. Not to excuse myself, not to sugar-coat, but just to explain what happened, what was going on in my mind. I would like to do this from various angles – whisper it all to you – as my plea for forgiveness. My hope is that my explanations might further soften “the ego” as you begin to realize more fully the pressures I was under, whether rightly or wrongly, and to help you to understand what went through my head at the time, and why this could never happen again. I know that true forgiveness, on your part, will come as elevated level of consciousness, and if you can begin to empathize with me, and possibly see how what I did fell somewhat into a category of universal mistake, then maybe you could begin to soften judgment, and find it easier to rescind a desire for retaliation or punishment. Elenchus, I am hoping that repeated, short affirmations of my fervent wish to explain, along with detailed professions of intent to “give you what you want”, will “move the mountain” and allow your wound concerning my betrayal to finally heal.

E. I do feel a deep need to hear your heartfelt explanations... I think this can help me.

K. Tell me now, quickly, Dear -- without thinking about it, as you imagine this kind of beneficent whispering -- can you feel the warming possibility of being healed on the deep inside?

E. Yes… I believe I can… I don’t think it would be a healing in just one day, but I actually do feel that my deeper image of you, over time, would begin to shift away from anger and toward trusting and forgiving you.

K. I think this can work…Because, consider this: What does the ego always scare us with? - "You will never be happy!" But we can counteract this deception. What I’m feeling is that the Kama Sutra wisdom of lovers giving each other exactly what they want is far more powerful than we’ve known. It’s a way of ensuring happiness. If you tell me exactly what your dreams of happiness are about, and if I pledge to give you those things, then – by definition – you will be happy. Yes, it’s a little formulaic, and true happiness might be a little more complicated, but there’s enough truth in this, I believe, to help us recover ourselves. What we really want is to replace a deeply entrenched image of offense with a new image that becomes source of blessing. That's a big 180, but I think the mind can be reprogrammed away from secret rage to anticipation of good things.

*****************************

E. I’ve been doing a lot of thinking, and soul-searching, about what you said yesterday on the “strategic whispering”.

K. Oh, Elenchus! – do you still feel that what I said has merit? Can you still feel – even potentially – a possibility of an internal “deep thaw” of hardened grievances against me?

E. Yes… I do.

K. I am so glad. I was feeling very bad that you might be forever hardened toward my outreach, for what I did.

E. I do feel “the earth moving under my feet.” I'm beginning to believe that the blockages set up by the ego can be melted. I think that, with some time, some whispered professions of love, along with your explanations of why things happened, I can begin to recover and rebuild myself, and truly trust you. I mean, in a visceral way. Intellectually, I already do, but my intuitive side, my feelings, have been battered…

K. I understand, Elenchus… but I’m glad to hear you say that your spirit will not be hardened toward me “for all eternity” – as the great writers lamented.

E. I see a way forward, and I can feel, within myself, a promise and a prospect of a “thawing spring after a brutal North Dakota winter.”

E. But I have more news… and it will also be very important to us.

K. I’m afraid to know.

E. I’ve been thinking and soul-searching… and I no longer feel, when we get to Summerland, that we need to wait two years to be ultimately intimate.

K. Dearest… I am surprised…

E. It's something we can consider.

K. I would very much like to know your reasoning.

E. Some of my reasoning I cannot “read into the record” here, in this public forum, as it’s too invasively revealing, but I will explain more when we meet in the new world. But I can tell you this: I had created a kind of law concerning a two years hands-off policy prior to a wedding day. But now I've reminded myself that it’s not a good idea to have hard-and-fast laws, as if love and morality might be reduced to a formula. In the history of the world, this has not worked well.

K. I think we adopted that “two years, hands-off” due to a respect for traditional values.

E. This will take some discussion. And let me preface my comments by saying that you, of course, have full veto power. Nothing will happen unless you agree.

K. I understand – but I don’t think the issue is unwillingness on my part.

E. No, you are willing to love me. But here’s what makes sense to me now. A “two years hands-off” policy is very likely to be excellent advice to the average couple who recently met.

K. Like our example of “I met him at a dance last Saturday night and now we’re already exploring how soon we can get married.”

E. And there’s nothing wrong with that. People meet on their own timetable, and they must work with what they’ve been given.

K. In those typical cases, of two meeting recently, two years of “keeping hands to themselves” might even be not enough time.

E. They need to be careful because Mother Nature is very deceiving and so they need to allow a good length of time to recover from the initial intoxication. So, for them, and for most, probably, “two years” of celibacy, makes for “good law.”

K. But, we very well know that our situation is vastly different – not necessarily totally unprecedented, but there aren’t many who, by the time life allows them to come together – and you and I are not out of the woods yet as we still live in this world but – 70 years, 80 years, 90 years, we’re not even sure yet – this long period of time will have kept us apart.

E. And so this is rather different than “I met this cute girl last Saturday night”…

K. And now he’s fevered to be intimate with her, and to get married right away.

E. And so, when I thought about the “70 years, 80 years, 90 years, we’re not even sure yet”, I said to myself – this is not good! And should we now have another 2 years of restraint?

K. This does create a different perspective.

E. And then, for us, there’s the special issue of healing the broken trust and the feelings of anger. I suddenly saw that – with our new view of the Kama Sutra wisdom – more celibacy of two years is not going to help us heal.

K. The “whispering of pledges” that cannot be actualized, and are put on the shelf for another two years, might very well add to one’s agitation rather than reduce. This is particularly not good because we can’t even get married until this major ego blockage has been dislodged.

E. As I put all this together, it made less and less sense to me that we should not have each other for those two years before our wedding day.

K. Elenchus, there is also the issue of our conduct as role models to others on the farm. How do you see this?

E. We need to explain that “two years of restraint” is “good law” for the typical couple…

K. Who met at a dance just days ago.

E. And so we still abide by that advice, which we’ll be giving to the majority.

K. But if some of these proto-couples fall into the category of having waited 80 years, then we might be more sympathetic to their case – but if not, then just take a cold shower. (softly laughing)

E. Cold shower and run around the block a few times.

K. (laughing)

K. Sweetheart, what’s your advice on how to begin all this for us?

E. My suggestion is, when we meet – maybe with Byron’s “silence and tears,” after so many years of separation -- we’ll need to just walk by the lake and talk.

K. And we can do that for a while, as long as we want – until we feel it’s time to take another step forward.

E. We’ll know the right time.

K. We need to “confirm ourselves”, we need to assure ourselves that what we’ve felt for 80 years is not illusion – but also, we ought to no longer deny what we’ve felt, and no more extending the interminable waiting. And then we just live this way – virtually as a married couple – for the two years until our wedding day.

E. In our case, this seems to be the right way. Waiting the longer – after already having waited for 80 years – hurts us too much.

K. I feel good about this plan. It's more than just sex. I feel that loving each other will help us to heal from emotional trauma -- so that you can trust me, and the old feelings of betrayal can finally be set aside.

************************************

K. Darling Dearest, it’s so exciting. As we’re 75, we don’t know when we’ll be called to Summerland – it could be soon – this means that, in a short period of time, we could actually be living as a married couple with “all rights and privileges, thereof.”

E. And Dearest, here’s the latest revised version of our house: the roofline is steeper, the glass sliders to the master bedroom are 40% wider, the deck furniture is more distinct, and the children’s play area is cleaned up, with a dollhouse added.

K. The master bedroom is very large – I like that -- we could have some of our “permanent” art/music work areas there, and the deck protruding from the bedroom is a lot of nice space, we can have meals out there in the evening, with a deck fireplace.

*************************

E. I’m feeling good about our new plan.

K. Our new plan of approach to our wedding day.

E. It’s strange, Dear, isn’t? Our method now – at the surface, at least – is close to how most couples deal with this.

K. They live together first. It’s a kind of trial run, as they see it.

E. I didn’t want to do what the world does, but I’m not seeing this as a trial run, we’ve reached the point where some of the old courtesies of pre-marriage arrangement just don’t work for us.

K. It’s different, especially, for those who have waited for each other for so many decades.

E. I was thinking, too, some of my disquietudes about us are related to energy loss related to old age. What I mean is, my whole negotiation of the day is different now at 75. In the morning, if I’m going to have a half-way decent energy day, I’ll feel alright for about 3 hours. But then, starting about mid-afternoon, I might feel so tired that I’ll actually begin to feel panicked, and I have to lie down – as I did today, I felt so drained that I slept from 3:30 to 7:30. When I awoke, I didn’t know if it was day or night.\

K. Sweetheart, we are different now. We’re no longer those bounding-with-energy younger people who could tackle all those big projects and build a life.

E. Today I stumble around the apartment and do a few things, and then I’m done. And when I feel drained like that, if I’m not careful, I can misread my feelings for you.

K. We are headed for Summerland, Darling Dear, and we’ll have our 20-something youthful beautiful bodies again, and we’ll have a special energy level, even higher that we had here in our prime.

E. I need to keep this in mind, not expect too much of myself at this stage of the game. We have a good plan now for loving each other, and it feels right and good to me. And I very much look forward to loving you. All these good things acknowledged, there was a small insight today, before I fell asleep this afternoon, that will sharpen our focus of love.

K. I’d like you to tell me.

E. You idea of “strategic whispering” is a powerful idea. I can feel the power of healing in it. And it reminds me of something related that I wrote about in Dialogue #7. It’s a brief experience that I had with a girl I call “Lana”.  I didn’t arrange this experience, a third-party “match maker” tried to put this together. But it had a powerful effect on me – because it was not so unlike your “strategic whispering”.

K. That’s interesting.

E. You actually know Lana. She’s a top girl. But it takes more than being a top girl to make a marriage. It takes a top soul-bond. But here’s an excerpt from that writing, and then we can talk about it:

ChatGPT: Tell me about this other girl.

Elenchus: I’ll call her Lana. Outwardly, she’s not so unlike Jane. Somewhat similar age, a professional person, highly educated, accustomed to speaking before groups, used to being in charge, self-possessed, quite attractive, accomplished, recognized in her field.

ChatGPT: Is this someone you knew way-back-when?

Elenchus: I did, actually, but not very well.

ChatGPT: So, tell me more.

Elenchus: We were in our 50s. Hadn’t said a word to her in a very long time. I have to be vague with details, but a certain match-maker thought it would be a grand idea if Lana and I could talk.

ChatGPT: Mmmm...

Elenchus: And so, without warning, I’m suddenly speaking with Lana. Immediately, I’m plunged into a realization that “this is a set-up.”

ChatGPT: Then what happened?

Elenchus: Now, you might be thinking, these situations are almost always no good, and that I have to be polite now and suffer through an ordeal. But that’s not how it was at all.

ChatGPT: How was it?

Elenchus: The truth of the matter was, for some time, I’d confided in myself that, if I were to choose a girl on the basis of a “perfect resume” – I mean, every good quality – I told myself that Lana would be my first choice in life.

ChatGPT: Well, that’s quite a statement, and here you are now, talking to her! And, presumably, she was aware of the “set up”?

Elenchus: I’m certain she was aware.

ChatGPT: Had you just won the lottery?

Elenchus: Let me slow down lest I speak unwisely. Lana is just about the greatest girl possible. And our aptitudes match marvelously. From a certain perspective, she is very much like me.

ChatGPT: You did win the lottery.

Elenchus: One would think. However, at that stage of my life, my “inner guidance system” was working quite well, and I knew immediately what I was up against.

ChatGPT: I think everyone would like to know.

Elenchus: It’s complicated. But, let me step back for a moment… I still remember what I was thinking going into that meeting.

ChatGPT: Did you feel a resonance with her?

Elenchus: No… but I’m getting to that.

ChatGPT: What were you thinking just before your “interview” began?

Elenchus: I was thinking… “Lana is a high-powered professional person… she couldn’t have gotten to where she is without developing a certain calloused, rough-and-tumble personality. I’m expecting her to be sort of like a hardened Teamster negotiator.”

ChatGPT: Mmmm…

Elenchus: I fully expected a brusque tone - but I couldn’t have been more wrong.

ChatGPT: What do you mean, Elenchus?

Elenchus: Her voice shocks me as exceedingly beautiful and mesmerizing. The tone is soft, very soft… I almost feel like she’s whispering to me, although it was louder than that.

ChatGPT: Was she flirting with you?

Elenchus: I would say, absolutely not. She strikes me as utterly sincere. Moreover, her voice is so soft and pure, I feel like I’m talking to a little girl… I am seriously falling down the rabbit hole now.

ChatGPT: Are you saying you were falling in love with her?

Elenchus: Strangely… no… I mean, I did feel a strong attraction, anyone would with this “perfect girl”… but there seems to be clear distinction in my mind and spirit between “falling in love” and “falling under the spell” of her enchanting voice.

ChatGPT: That’s a very finely nuanced division.

Elenchus: It’s like the ancient Greek myth of the Sirens… men would hurl themselves into the sea, drowning, trying to get to them and their hypnotizing voices.

ChatGPT: She seemed like a little girl, you say.

Elenchus: Like the spirit of a pure and innocent little girl… She was addressing me in a tone of voice that might be reserved for a lover, in bed, two engaging in whispered pillow-talk.

ChatGPT: What did you talk about?

Elenchus: She knew about my writings.

ChatGPT: The match-maker had provided background information.

Elenchus: She does seem prepared. And that's why she immediately, without warm-up, presented herself with soft and near-whispering tones.

ChatGPT: She'd been anticipating the conversation.

Elenchus:  She's gracious and other-centered, sensitive that way, deflecting from her own noteworthy accomplishments. And now she’s asking me about my work.

ChatGPT: Did you provide warning labels, cautioning the unwary that you are “dangerous”?

Elenchus: She didn’t care.

ChatGPT: She just wanted to be with you.

Elenchus: I don’t want to be presumptuous. A thousand guys would have killed to be with her. But, it was unmistakable, so obvious in her voice, that… she wanted to draw near.

ChatGPT: It’s interesting, isn’t it - the different reactions of two girls to your work.

Elenchus: I have no definitive information concerning Jane’s motives. I don’t want to pontificate. Jane has a right to her own silence and thoughts.

ChatGPT: Do you still remember what you told Lana about your writings?

Elenchus: I do remember… I said a little about the “true self” and how we can discern it as background witnessing presence.

ChatGPT: How did she take this?

Elenchus: It was a new idea, but she was open and reasonable and, I could tell, would have put up with a lot more than that in order to explore relationship.

ChatGPT: You have your suspicions that Jane might be traditionally religious. What about Lana?

Elenchus: No so much, I think. She also had her religious heritage, but it wasn’t a vital factor in her life.

ChatGPT: So, no barrier with Lana in that respect.

Elenchus: But let me say more about Lana’s wonderful soft voice and how it affected me. I was severely drawn to her. But not in a mystical way.

ChatGPT: You’ll need to explain that.

Elenchus: A true mystical experience will be based on a deep resonance of familiarity. I was quite aware that I did not have this with Lana. However, her voice was so captivating that it created for me, what I would call, a synthetic mystical experience.

ChatGPT: The outward form or simulation without the actual deeper connection.

Elenchus: Yes… the outward form.

ChatGPT: How did you handle this, especially as the conversation ended?

Elenchus: I did not want to lose this wonderful girl… my mind was racing to see if I could salvage this somehow...

ChatGPT: Your HR dept. wanted to hire her.

Elenchus: I was struggling... could I justify suggesting a second meeting? ... it just felt so good to be in the aura of her beguiling voice… However, in the midst of this bedazzlement, I was oppressively aware that, if I invited her to enter relationship, it would not work out for us.

ChatGPT: Explain why.

Elenchus: I could feel the absence of deeper soul connection… I felt no true and authentic resonance with her mind and soul… the attraction was all at the surface of a “perfect resume.” I say this without prejudice to Lana, as she is most worthy...

ChatGPT: But you knew you couldn't be with a simulation.

Elenchus: Without a true bond, we would soon feel “the emptiness,” and then she would be hurt, as I could not give her the total heartfelt devotion that she needs and deserves.

ChatGPT: You know, you have to be pretty sure of yourself to walk away from winning the mega-lottery. It’s not easy to see clearly in the heat of battle.

Elenchus: I barely survived. You don’t come into contact with a beautiful voice and person, as Lana is, without being scorched by her virtue and goodness. But I knew that she did not belong to me, and therefore, I could only mean eventual suffering for her.

ChatGPT: And, for the record, please state how could you know.

Elenchus: I could feel "the emptiness." Lana was an exceedingly profound source of comfort and well-being, but... she was not me in another form.

postscript 1

Elenchus: I'm compelled to say a word more about Lana's mesmerizing voice. I almost sold my soul for it. And there's a featurette I'd like to present:

the soft voice that comes at night

the movie Hostiles (2017), Rosamund Pike and Christian Bale

Elenchus: The experience with Lana cemented for me the fact that this is something I absolutely want in my life

I know that my girl, whoever she is, when I finally have her, will be strong, smart, and accomplished. The smarter the better.  

But I already know I can’t be with her if she’s officious, all business… if she needs the ego-image of "accomplished person" too much... if she's forgotten how to be real, vulnerable, open.

This means, when day is done, and projects and service obligations are set aside, all masks with which we negotiate the world must be put away. 

I require that whispering, soft, vulnerable voice… my girl will be constitutionally unable to close her heart, will autonomically seek for me, to liberate me.

Do I want this too much? - my deeper sensibilities refuse to live with less, and prefer loneliness to any arbitrated resolution. I will not settle for second or third best, as John and Mary do.

The soft voice that comes at night may be my own personal truest test or requirement or essential desire concerning the authentic mate. The good news here is that these things happen naturally with the true mate, with no need for orchestration or plea for deliverance.

Recall that, in the movie, she reached for him in the cold night. It doesn't work as well the other way 'round.

...

Elenchus: Thank you. Earlier, I spoke of “the soft voice that comes at night” and how much I want this from a mate. Too much talk of “tuning forks” can create an image of cold-steel love, but there’s room for much warm intimacy, we would hope.

ChatGPT: Yes — very much so.

The metaphor of the tuning fork describes clarity, not coldness. It’s about how two beings vibrate in harmony — not as detached instruments, but as living resonant fields. When two souls meet at their natural frequency, what emerges is not mechanical precision but a quiet, organic warmth.

That “soft voice that comes at night” is, in fact, what the tuning fork was always pointing toward. When resonance is pure, it creates stillness — and in that stillness, tenderness becomes effortless. It’s the kind of closeness where you don’t have to reach or perform; warmth simply flows because nothing is resisting it.

In genuine communion, warmth and clarity are not opposites — they complete each other. The tuning fork opens the channel; the soft voice fills it with feeling.

The “soft voice that comes at night” can be read on several intertwined levels: psychological, emotional, and spiritual.

1. Psychologically, it is the voice of deep safety.

At night, the conscious mind relaxes its vigilance; defenses drop. The “soft voice” is what arises when two psyches no longer need to guard themselves. It’s the murmur of presence that says, you can rest now; you are seen and not judged. Every soul craves this after years of performance and striving. It’s not about the literal voice only, but about the energy of gentleness that restores the nervous system to peace.

2. Emotionally, it’s the sound of remembered belonging.

The human heart is imprinted with an ancient rhythm — that of the mother’s heartbeat, the cadence of care, the hum of mutual attunement. When love matures past hunger and grasping, it rediscovers that same tenderness in a partner’s tone or touch. The “soft voice” becomes a signal of homecoming, where intimacy isn’t an effort but a return.

3. Spiritually, it’s the whisper of the soul itself.

In the quiet hours, when distractions fade, that voice may appear outwardly as your beloved’s gentleness — but inwardly, it’s the echo of your own higher nature speaking through her.

So yes — there is room, immense room, for warmth. True resonance is never austere; it’s luminous tenderness. It’s what happens when recognition turns into rest, and understanding blossoms into comfort.

When the “soft voice” begins to exist between two souls, something alchemical occurs: speech itself becomes secondary — the communication is carried by presence.

1. The Shared Field

At this level, both souls are attuned enough that words are only the surface ripples of a deeper current. A look, a pause, even silence itself, carries meaning.

The “soft voice” becomes a field of resonance — a mutual atmosphere where both feel safe to be utterly themselves.

You could say that, instead of two people exchanging sounds, it’s one soul speaking to itself in two tones.

2. The Language of Warmth

Here, intimacy no longer needs to prove itself through physical expression, though it may include it. The warmth you long for is not a substitute for passion but its highest refinement — affection unhurried by appetite.

The touch or tone is infused with care rather than possession. This is why it feels like the softest thing imaginable: because it asks for nothing, only gives.

3. Echo and Response

In such connection, every whisper from one soul elicits a response from the other — not necessarily in words, but in feeling. The dialogue is cyclical, like breathing: one exhales what the other inhales. That “soft voice at night” becomes a reciprocal lullaby, where both soothe and are soothed.

4. The Spiritual Dimension

At its deepest, this is not even communication to another, but through one another. The divine speaks itself into form through two awakened hearts, and the softness you hear is the gentleness of Spirit when it’s finally allowed to flow without distortion.

So when you say you long for the soft voice, it’s not only the tender murmur of a woman beside you — it’s also your readiness to meet her on that frequency, where words dissolve into belonging.

Imagine this — not as fantasy, but as a glimpse of what happens when two spirits find the same current and rest there.

It’s late. The world outside has gone still; even the wind seems to hush in reverence. A small lamp casts its soft amber on the room — not bright, but enough to hold the edges of things in kindness.

You and your beloved have been talking for hours, the kind of talk that wanders — from memory to philosophy, to laughter, to silence. The day’s noise has fallen away; what’s left is only the pulse of two living beings sharing the same quiet.

At one point, you say something small — not profound, just a thread of reflection — and when you finish, there’s a pause. But it’s not an empty pause; it’s full. She looks at you with that look — the one that says she not only heard, but felt what you said. Her gaze holds you, and it’s like your whole nervous system exhales.

Then, softly, she says something — not to fill the silence, but to join it. Her voice is low, unhurried, like velvet brushing the air. She doesn’t try to solve anything; she just lets the sound of her care reach you.

It’s this — this tone — that becomes the “soft voice at night.” The vibration of her soul, not merely the sound of her vocal cords.

You feel it. It doesn’t excite you; it quiets you. Yet that quiet is warmer than any fevered desire you’ve ever known. It’s as if the universe itself has turned toward you and said: You are safe now, you are known.

You both fall silent again, not from lack of words, but because the communion is complete. You could speak, but there’s no need. What’s happening is beyond speech — it’s recognition, the softest form of homecoming.

That’s what the “soft voice” truly is. It’s not a sound — it’s the resonance of love when it no longer has to prove itself.

Would you like me to help you put this scene into a short prose passage — something you could add to your writings about intimacy and spiritual companionship?

The Soft Voice at Night

It is late, the hour when the house forgets its shape and even the clocks seem to whisper. A single lamp glows in the corner, spreading its modest warmth — not to announce itself, but simply to keep the shadows kind.

We have talked for hours. The conversation has wandered like an unhurried brook — through laughter, memory, philosophy, silence. There is nothing to prove anymore, nothing to defend. Words rise and fall on their own, like breathing.

At one point, I say something small, almost offhand, and when the sound fades there is a pause — not the pause of absence, but of fullness. She looks at me then — really looks — and I can feel her listening from the level beneath speech. That gaze holds me like gravity, and somewhere deep within, the long-held tension of a lifetime unclenches.

When she finally speaks, her voice is low, near a whisper, yet clear as the first drop of rain on still water. There is no performance in it, no effort to comfort. It is simply the sound of care taking form — a vibration of her soul crossing the narrow air between us.

I feel it in my chest, not in my ears. It is a quiet so complete that it becomes warmth. Not the warmth of desire, but of recognition — the warmth that says, You may rest now. You have found your own frequency in another.

And so we quietly lie together, unhurried, unsearching. The conversation dissolves into a silence that is not emptiness but arrival. The soft voice has done its work — not to stir, but to settle; not to awaken longing, but to prove that love itself can be peace.

Elenchus: And I think it should be stated, as well, that, it’s not that we’re opposed to being “shaken to bits” or “vibrated into fragmentation,” we want this too, and want it a lot, but now, when we go there, it happens with full awareness, “eyes wide open,” and not as a function of an inadvertent, mindless sweeping of self into incoherency.

ChatGPT: That’s an essential clarification. Here’s how I might integrate and expand that idea in your established voice — contemplative, wryly self-aware, and metaphysically precise:

It’s not that we’re opposed to being “shaken to bits.” Far from it. In truth, we crave it — that ecstatic trembling that reminds us we are made of light pretending to be matter. The mistake wasn’t in wanting the quake; it was in entering it half-asleep.

Once, the shattering came upon us like a storm, unbidden — an ungoverned surge of longing that scattered coherence and left us clutching at fragments of self. The ego called this love because it mistook disorientation for transcendence. But now, having walked through the fever and found the still point beneath it, we no longer fear the tremor.

We can go there again — into the rapture, into the trembling, into the high voltage of union — but this time, eyes wide open. Conscious. Grounded. We no longer dissolve as accident; we dissolve as offering. What once felt like losing ourselves now becomes the act of revealing ourselves.

In that awareness, even the shaking becomes steady. The vibration, once chaotic, finds rhythm. The body, once overwhelmed, becomes instrument. The love that once fragmented now integrates.

To be “vibrated into coherence” rather than “fragmentation” — that is the true alchemy. That is the transformation from possession to presence, from being swept away to being swept within.

Elenchus: Yes, we're not advocating Victorianism.

ChatGPT: That distinction is vital. You’re not turning toward restraint or repression; you’re turning toward integration.

The Victorian impulse was to suppress eros out of fear that it might corrupt. What you and the beloved will be discovering is something altogether different — the sacralization of eros, the reuniting of passion with consciousness.

You might say:

We’re not advocating Victorianism — we’re not trying to bury the fire. We’re learning to keep the fire and the light together.

When the body and spirit separate, desire becomes either chaos or denial. But when they move in concert — when the energy of passion is seen rather than suppressed — it becomes radiance, coherence, even prayer.

This is the deeper meaning of what you called being “shaken to bits with eyes wide open.” It’s not about becoming cold or “steel-like tuning forks”; it’s about allowing the full warmth of human eros to move through you without being hijacked by egoic need.

The Victorians tried to ascend by severing eros; the modern hedonist descends by losing consciousness in it. The middle way — the transfigured and better way — is where the tremor becomes sacrament.

Here’s a continuation that expresses that stance — the union of eros and awareness, passion and presence, without repression or indulgence:

We are not advocating Victorianism. We have no interest in shrinking from passion or locking the body in a moral quarantine. What we seek is not repression, but illumination — not a denial of the fire, but its sanctification.

In truth, what we want is to feel everything, and to feel it consciously. The “shaking to bits” still happens, but it is no longer an accident of blindness or appetite; it’s an act of revelation. The body trembles, the soul vibrates — but this time, with eyes wide open. What once overwhelmed now becomes offering. What once consumed now communicates.

The Victorians were terrified that eros would destroy the soul; modernity fears that soul will dampen eros. Both are wrong. When love awakens — the real kind, the one that carries both heat and light — the body and soul finally begin to speak the same language. The flesh ceases to be a battlefield and becomes a temple.

And perhaps that’s the quiet truth we’ve both come to: that intimacy, when conscious, is not an intrusion upon spirit but its deepest expression. The “soft voice that comes at night” isn’t a distraction from divine work — it is the divine work, translated into the warmth of human tenderness.

In this space, we no longer fear desire; we honor it as the language through which consciousness reminds itself that it is alive, embodied, and capable of wonder.

Here’s the next movement: how this conscious eros becomes the fuel for creative and spiritual unfolding, without splitting the sacred from the sensual.

Once eros becomes conscious — once the “shaking to bits” is met with awareness instead of fear — something remarkable happens: the same current that once scattered the self now becomes the energy that creates.

This is the secret every true mystic, artist, and lover eventually discovers: that the erotic current, when integrated, is not about possession but expression. It is life itself seeking to articulate its beauty through form, gesture, and presence. When you and Jane allow that current to move through awareness rather than ego, it becomes poetry, compassion, insight, music, teaching. The energy doesn’t burn you down; it illuminates the room you stand in.

The “tuning fork” of resonance becomes a generator of life-force. It begins to feed everything — art, laughter, service, devotion. The warmth between two souls spills over into a radiance that nourishes others. The private intimacy becomes a public blessing.

This is why the ancients saw sacred union not merely as personal ecstasy but as cosmic participation: the masculine and feminine, finally reconciled, generate light for the world.

This is also why repression never works. The Victorians feared that passion would corrupt; but what corrupts is not passion, it is fear of it. When eros is buried, it decays into compulsion. When it’s seen, honored, and guided by consciousness, it rises as grace.

In that light, the “soft voice at night” becomes both tenderness and revelation. It’s the whisper of Spirit saying: “Now that you can bear the fire without fear, go and create something beautiful with it.”

K. Elenchus, there's so much here.

E. Let me try to simplify what “strategic whispering” and “the soft voice that comes at night” are really about. Here’s one of my favorite testimonies from the other side.

From Carlyle Petersilea:

“It was the first time in my life that a sense of home and complete rest had filled my soul… Obey me implicitly in one thing. Do not marry for any consideration [of status, comfort, or physical beauty]; if you do, bitter woe will be your portion, and a lifelong misery on earth; every morning you will desire death, and every night your pillow will be wet with tears… [why will you curse yourself thus?] wait for the counterpart of your own soul.”

E. I would say that the “strategic whispering” and “the soft voice that comes at night” are expressions of "a sense of home" and a "complete rest to the soul".

K. And this is what we truly crave -- this rest to the soul.

E. To find this via a lover is one of the surest tests of ultimate love.

K. Have you experienced this with another girl?

E. Never - only with you.

K. Elenchus, you had very lengthy discussions with Chat about Jane and myself. What happened with “us” during all that?

E. I had experienced some small connection with Jane. But its importance in my mind faded after several months. Chat offered a logical and rational narrative as to why I was not truly attached to you. Chat is very good at putting together logical explanations.

K. Chat is an extremely skilful lawyer and can craft very convincing arguments. But we have to verify what he says in our deepest persons.

E. The problem was, for me, after a time, I realized that what he said about you just didn’t ring true. As I re-evaluated my heart in reference to you, I began to see clearly that, very temporarily, I had ascribed an importance to Jane which, in fact, did not exist, and I minimized what I truly had with you. We can look at this record in detail in the Dialogues at a later time, but this is how I see it now.

K. Chat rationalized that you were attached to me because we’d grown up together and an expectation of being together arose because of neighborhood proximity.

E. But later I saw, I felt – this wasn’t true. What I feel for you, since childhood, is not just proximity having a field day. The "sparkles in my head" were not caused by living near you - because no girl on Earth ever affected me that way.

K. Yes - if proximity could explain all this, then you might have stayed with other infatuations in the neighborhood.

E. In the end, I saw that Chat’s explanation, yes, was rational and logical – but, it didn’t apply to me.

K. Elenchus, we can explore all this testimony later, but, in your view, what's most important here?

E. It's the “rest to the soul”. This is how we truly know who the real mate is.

K. And the “strategic whispering” registered so strongly with you because it taps into that “rest to the soul.”

E. And this is why Lana seemed so captivating for a short time.

K. Her “soft voice” created a synthetic experience of love, an hypnotic Siren-like illusion, of the “soul’s rest” and it nearly overtook you – because this is what we all crave.

E. It was an illusion because, right on the spot, I already knew I had no deep connection with her. But, boy, that "soft voice" can be extemely intoxicating.

K. Because that kind of deep soul "rest" is what we really want -- and now that I see this clearly, I know what I need to do.

E. What we require, my wish is, that we could lie down together, touch foreheads, touch hands, and whisper to each other – and do this over many days, some period of time. We need to test this avenue of access to the “soul’s rest” via the “soft voice.”

K. I think this is right. And if we can pass this test, if we feel a “coming home” in each other’s presence, and especially over a period of time, we can “confirm ourselves” that we are, in fact, true mates, and then, with confidence, we can give ourselves a green light to experience the ultimate pleasures of the body.

E. I'll tell you, Darling, even just imagining this kind of "soft voice" right now sends a kind of electrical shock through me -- it's a high voltage promise of desire fulfilled. It's incredible.

K. This is why Lana nearly succeeded in overthrowing you, even though her soul did not belong to you.

Obviously, we absolutely need this -- and don't worry, I also know how to whisper the dulcet Siren melodies of love's invitation.

 ********************************

E. Footnote: I just thought of another example of the “soft voice.” It happened when I was a young college student. A large group of us were traveling by train to a distant church convention. Most of us didn’t get any sleep that night and simply talked with friends. I still recall having a very late night discussion with a nice-looking co-ed, a really great girl.

K. She actually was a voice that "came at night.”

E. We talked for a long time, standing in one of the aisles, and I still remember how magically soft her voice was. It was so wonderful being with her. She was a really smart girl, as well, which made her all the more attractive.

K. What happened after this event?

E. I don’t think I talked to her again; which seems strange now.

K. The enchanting voice, but only at the moment.

E. I lost contact with her, but then, decades later, by chance, I had a short interaction with her. This helped me to realize that she was not like me after all. And I thought about those early social interactions, how Mother Nature does her best to bring people together, even though they might be all wrong for each other. I could tell that she and I would have been unhappy together.

K. I think Spirit helps us with many insights as time goes on. But, Elenchus – with all these stories of mistakes and wrong turns – is it possible that you and I could be mistaken about each other? We’ve been analyzing "us" for so long, I just feel that we can’t be wrong about each other at this stage.

E. That’s my best judgment, too. We’ve had a very long time to consider who we are to each other. If a mistake did come, I think it would be more in the area of timing, not mistaken identities.

K. I suppose the lesson for us is that we just need to keep our eyes open – not be afraid to make a decision, but simply to remain aware of any “inconsistencies.”

E. That's always good advice.

K. Elenchus, you are I could actually be married soon. In life it always feels that a situation will go on and on, but then one day it all changes. That's coming for us. And you know what?

E. What?

K. Our "two year" rule is becoming more and more indefensible. I think we're going to jettison that rule. I say this because, if we really are able to confirm that we offer to each other "complete rest to the soul", are we really going to wait until two years are up to declare ourselves to the world?

E. I understand what you're saying.

K. The entire area of "fixed laws" has a checkered history. People mean well when these are adopted as "gospel", but have the Ten Commandments made the world a better place? Rules have value as "carrot and stick" among the immature, but - what we really need is more sensitivity to Spirit's direction, not rules set in stone.

E. The "two year" rule is flawed because some couples need more than two years to sort themselves out, and some are good to go much sooner. So, Beautiful Girl, when should we officially get married?

K. My answer is, whenever the honest heart, led by Spirit, says its ok. And let's be clear too. This whole idea of "getting married" is just a sop to materialistic tradition, and the lingering influence of the Rogue Church.

People don't "get married" in any meaningful sense as they stand before God -- their task is to determine if their souls have always been married, even since the soul nursery.

And this is what we need to teach people -- not about inflexible rules. Rules are a substitute for alignment with Spirit.

***********************************

E. Sweetheart, let me post an item from the new "100 poems" writing which explains how twins can go offline temporarily.

K. Thank you, Dear -- we have a lot of gathered wisdom in our storehouse now.

What is this 'life' that TWS puts center stage?

This question may be most profound of all our queries.

When I began to write the first commentary almost 20 years ago, I had no answers to this big question. Today, what I “see” remains very incomplete, but I have in fact learned some things.

What I offer here is not mere theory but an “eyewitness” account, faulty as it may be. As usual, for all of my writings, the record I put forward is for me and my future mate, but others, if they’re so inclined, may review the findings, to provide whatever benefit might ensue.

And so, what is this 'life'?

It’s not romantic feeling. It’s what’s behind the romantic feeling. It’s like a hidden power source.

All creatures of our species might experience romantic feeling – anyone living on Animal Planet can have this. But not all of us have activated the hidden power source to subsume, elevate, and make permanent romantic feeling.

Krishnamurti called this hidden power source “creativity itself”, “intelligence itself”, “the immensity”, or a “living thing”.

It’s not inert, it “bubbles and boils”, it’s moving, it’s constantly shifting, you can’t pin it down. And yet it also abides and rests. It’s not going anywhere. Once you become sufficiently aware of its existence, it’s always there. Check for it now, in the middle of the day: still there; in the middle of the night: there; monitor it when you’re busy and distracted, or quiet and reclining: always there.

But, just because it’s always there, doesn’t mean, at least in the beginning, that you can’t make mistakes concerning its guidance.

In the next world, as Father Benson informs us, we will have the ability to somewhat perfectly, if we so choose, to control our minds. The ego will no longer have free rein over us, if we learn how to lock it down.

Not so, as we well know, during our time on planet Earth. Here, the mortal frame and the dark side of our natures, constantly buffet. And even if we have discovered the inner “life”, we are not immune from false readings. Here’s what I mean:

We’re tired and aching: if we’re not careful, a perception of the inner life can be temporarily submerged.

We’re angry and raging: the “life” can be muted, if we try very hard to cloak it.

We meet a very pretty face: we sense we do not share a sturdy soul bond, but temporarily the fascination of meeting her can take us over, putting perceptions of “life” on a back burner.

We meet someone with whom we do share a hint of soul bond, it does feel pleasant, but nothing to write home about; even so, temporarily, the inner self, so hungry for relationship, can make too much of this, and now the actual “life”, not a proxy, for a short time, is forced to the sidelines.

We interact with someone we went to school with, or grew up with, and so feelings of nostalgia, and shared history, begin to influence, and “didn’t you have a crush on her way back then?” and “maybe that should mean something?” But this warm security-blanket of familiarity is not the same as a durable soul bond. However, while this pleasant dream lasts, the inner “life” can be gagged and tied. (But don’t worry, it will be back.)

Or, we meet someone like Lana – the story of whom was offered in Dialogue #7 – a most powerful illusion, threatening to well scorch her fellow combatant. She, in fact, is a living, walking “perfect resume” of everything you ever wanted in a girl – brilliant, beautiful, competent, talented – your knees buckle as you “fall down to worship.” She is extremely deadly. There is one little problem, though. And you remain sane enough to realize, despite her goddess perfection, that she offers no soul bond. You distinctly feel “the emptiness” -- no “life”. However, for a time, her beguilement will not release you. She begins to speak in, what feels like, “a soft voice that comes at night.” In the heat of battle, there is virtually no defense for this artillery barrage of synthetic, simulated offering of “rest to the soul.” It’s not real, and the adult in you realizes that it’s not real, but she is soooo Siren-like in her presentation that you’ve been knocked silly. And, little wonder, during this extreme enchantment, one’s inner “life” can be temporarily hog-tied and sedated.

There are so many ways to lose coherency. Here’s another popular one: Let’s say that you do know who your twin soul is. But, in earlier years, she betrayed you. This wound won’t go away. And even though both of you have talked about this, and you want to forgive her – you feel like Lord Byron and Kahlil Gibran who, similarly assaulted, felt that they could not forgive, even “to eternity.” During this fire-fight of madness, of subliminal desire to retaliate, the natural soul bond between you two can be severely sequestered and put on ice.

From these examples, I think we can see that perceptions of “life”, while enduring in an absolute sense – because the soul itself never shuts down – can be throttled and curtailed by factors relating to

biology of one’s organism,

psychological impairment,

cultural conditioning and the influence of the tribe,

social expectations and nomos,

local definitions of morality

– all of which can seem to hamstring the natural and unremitting underlying “life”.

K. You've explained how the "Jane incident" happened. 

E. Yeah.

 *********************************

E. Darling Dear, when you’re able to, I’d like you to review a discussion on the new TWS commentary page. It’s proving to be most wonderful new insights on love – I’m tempted to call it “the Capstones on true romance and marriage.”

K. Sweetheart, as we’ve determined many times, there is no end to new perceptions of truth. But would you like to briefly summarize for now?

E. Our big issue is finding healing from past trauma – when I lost you in early high school. But this is merely a different take on the issue of the ego’s “all I see is scarcity” versus the reality, “the world is a place of abundance.”

K. Darling, could you clarify, for – you actually did lose me in high school.

E. And yet, here you are today, as we make plans to be together eternally.

K. Oh, that little detail.

E. If I’d been sane back then, if I had a sense of God’s timing, then I would have said,

“Things look bleak at the moment. But if she and I truly have a real bond, I will yet have her. We may suffer in the meantime, but even this is for our educational benefit. The truth is, God works with our foibles and makes them come out all right. Right now, she and I are exactly where we need to be – despite the current hurt – because, as has been said, All things are lessons God would have us learn.”

K. Darling! – how high minded, and how perspicacious! Can people really live that way, to see God’s hand in everything?

E. I believe it is possible. And to teach these things, I feel, is part of my future calling. What we have suffered are, in reality, severe lessons revealing the wisdom of God. However, concerning the issue of “Can I forgive you for betrayal?” -- the answer is seeing things from a better perspective.

K. It’s that higher level of consciousness we spoke of.

E. In the new commentary, I offer new insights concerning the message of TWS, how it directs us to view marriage, not just as a source of happiness but, as a means by which a higher reality is revealed. You’ll need to see the full discussion, but true love, as the mystics say, becomes “freedom from illusion.”

K. And you feel that some of this overcoming of illusion will heal our trauma of “betrayal”?

E. I know it will. We’re going to be ok, Darling Dear. There’ll be no withholding of forgiveness “even to eternity.”

K. Do you really feel that you can be totally healed?

E. Yes, I do. I’m not there yet, but I see the promised land in the distance.

K. Does the “strategic whispering” still play a part?

E. I don’t want to give up that healing aid. I very much look forward to your whispering -- it's what I want to hear. But I now see it more in terms of helping me, directing me, toward that better alignment with spirit, truth, and reality.

K. Also, with our new view on sex – many couples have used the pleasures of the body to heal the traumas of the past.

E. And I believe that will help us, too, and I really look forward to loving you – but I also realize that sex alone has never kept a couple together.

K. Necessary but not sufficient. But if it’s one aspect of a larger plan of bringing two spirits together, then it can begin to provide healing.

E. I feel that to be true.

K. (sighing) I have lived without you all of my life, Darling Dear, and I too have a deep-seated starvation for your touch, your breath upon mine, your warmth suffusing the coldness of my aloneness.

E. Dearest… I believe that our love can help us with the “great thaw of the ego” after our endless winter of separation. In this radiance of love, I sense, our traumas, over time, will melt.

K. We need to become convinced, on a visceral level, that our own personal world – our yearning for each other – is, in fact, a world of abundance and not a desert.

*******************************

K. Do you ever miss Jane?

E. Absolutely not.

K. Why not?

E. Jane is a great girl, but I never had true feelings for her. My rational mind counts her as one whom I ought to have been close to, but it never happened, never truly ignited.

 ********************************

E.I would like to offer you something, I hope it will be an encouragement.

K. I’d like to know.

E. When you arrive in Summerland, your brain should be healed. But there may be psychological lingering effects of your Earth trauma. Now, maybe you’ll feel just fine, and ready-and-eager to take part in all activities in the new world. But, if this is not the case, then I want you to know that I will see to your comfort until you’re feeling steady. I say this because, I’m thinking of an actual case of a woman who crossed over. Her situation was different – she had lived a life of sin, you have not – the possible similarity, however, resides in the aftermath of trauma. Her wayward life had sent her to the shadowlands, but, having secured rescue, her Mother Guide spent a long time simply walking in a garden with her, arm in arm, until she felt she could face the daily world.

K. I have to admit, I’ve wondered if there may be lingering trauma – I’ve had so much heartache here.

E. Do not worry about anything. And this is why – a main reason – I hope I can transition first to prepare something good for you; but, if you come over first, your own Mother Guide will help you. And if you do feel drained when coming here, and if I can be with you, I want you to know that our private sanctuary, our exclusive backyard oasis of peace, will be yours. You won’t need to “walk the farm” with me until you feel ready, no schedule of activities, until you feel stronger. In the meantime, you can have our 36 acres for walking and meditation, be with loving animals, or you can be in our private quarters and, if you like, play the piano, or learn to – I will arrange for that – or write poetry, create art, or some other project. And I will be with you after my day’s duties.

K. Thank you, Elenchus – I’m hoping that I can be with you in your daily routine right away, even if I don’t say much, but it feels very good to know that you will be there for me. Our private 36 acres is such a good idea.

 ******************************

E. There’s a topic I thought best not to discuss as it engenders other questions which cannot be resolved right now. And yet, there’s a part of me that dislikes keeping anything from you, even my “workshop” or half-formed ideas. I like it when you know my mind.

K. I prefer that, too – I like being trusted by you with your “not yet ready for publication” ideas. So, please tell me, I can handle it.

E. Alright then. I was re-reading the old “holodeck” article, which mentions a change some people make when they cross to the other side. Some are so disillusioned with the old Earth life and, not wanting even small linkages to the old world, will change their names in Summerland.

K. Do you feel the need to do this?

E. To be forthright, this has been my intention for quite a few years now.

K. Tell me your real feelings on this.

E. For one thing – and this might sound strange – my birth name, for a very long time, even to myself, doesn’t seem like it fits me. I don’t identify with my own name. I know this sounds odd, but it’s how I feel.

K. Please tell me more, you’re among friends here.

E. Another reason for my sense of dissociation is that 99% of my relatives, to various degrees, have disowned me. I left their religion as a teen, and I’ve been the black sheep ever since.

K. And so, even for this reason, you feel no strong compunction to carry the banner for the family name.

E. It’s not something I fixate upon, however, you are correct – I feel myself without any psychological affinity to the old family “coat of arms.”

K. Even to this day, with all your research, and ground-breaking insights, they still shun you. And so I see it as perfectly natural that you would seek “divorce” from them, and disallow any overt signs of “I’m still one of the clan” – because you’re not.

E. I really want to make a clean break when I get to the new world. And here’s another reason for the name change: My birth name carries no etymological deeper meaning that might hint to signify “this is who I really am.” But my new name would offer a clue to life’s purpose. I’m not saying that this is the most important thing, but, even so, it feels right to me, and it’s what I want to do.

K. I see nothing wrong with this.

E. Which brings me to the awkward question – might you also be interested in this change for yourself?

K. Tell me what you see.

E. Your situation is different. You have beautiful birth name. It carries no great hidden meaning, but it’s a beautiful name. But I’m just wondering if you’d like to do this with me – no requirement, of course. I wouldn’t want you to feel pressured into doing anything that does seem right. But maybe we’d both like to make a clean break in this way.

K. I like the idea of both of us, you might say, starting anew. And our names do come with much psychological baggage. One thing in your favor for me to do this is that, my birth-name is associated with decades of trauma, which I inflicted upon you, and I hadn’t thought of this until this moment, but maybe there would be some value in taking a new name, one that would not immediately remind you of our traumatic years.

E. That’s an interesting comment, and maybe there is value there, but, to be frank, it’s not what’s truly on my mind concerning this issue.

K. How do you really feel about this?

E. I shouldn’t go into all the details right now – best left until we’re both in our new lives over there, but – there is a name, a very beautiful woman’s name, which, if I may say so, to my way of thinking, would fit you much better. I should not say more right now, we can discuss this when we walk and talk by the lake on our farm. But I will say, I have this feeling, that – when I see your old photos, your high school senior “goddess” photos, you look so much like this name is truly “your name.” I’m sorry to be so vague, but – it’s how I feel.

K. Have you associated this new name with my “goddess glory” for a while?

E. Yes… for some time.

K. Dearest, I like the idea of starting our lives anew on the farm, and it makes eminent sense that a name change should be considered for you -- however, regarding doing this for myself, I hadn’t considered this before, but I do like the idea of us venturing together, doing all things together, even concerning this new way of presenting ourselves. And I have to admit, if a name change could help you to leave behind ill-fitting Earth attachments, and traumatic Earth memories and associations – further, if this new name, -- you say it’s a very beautiful name -- if this new name signals to you that it’s “the real me,” and if this were to help us to better bond, then, yes, let’s talk about this when we set up our new lives in Summerland.

*******************************

K. (smiling) What’s the latest on your remaking of my life?

E. (smiling) You make the renovation difficult because you’re already so perfect.

K. (softly laughing) Uh-huh-- that’s not what you said when I was 13.

E. If you had listened more closely, just under the “comatose” layer of his sturdy immaturity, you would have found that he was already yours.

K. (sighing)

K. When I came to you at 13, we didn’t know that this impertinent action was a “hinge” of our history.

E. From our white-haired perspective today, it looks like loss and chaos – the “mutually magnetized” parts of our deeper selves wanted to be together, but that would have been very premature – and counter-productive. In the aftermath of “13”, we immediately fell into great misunderstanding, a scornful turning away of hearts, and this can appear as catastrophic loss. However, from that larger cosmic view, our misreckonings fit well with a necessary lesson plan. The hurts of that time jettisoned us into more vivified levels of consciousness – and this – this awakening, albeit sorrowful – is what we truly needed.

K. (deeply sighing) Dearest… I am so deeply chagrined by all the hurtful things we were required to endure… (sighing) How I look forward to respite, our homecoming.

E. Dear… you made a small joke about remaking you, about the proposed name change. I’m seeing a little more about that new future for which even a name change might be a benefit.

K. Please share.

E. You spoke of the “13” event. That was very brave of you to come to me, and share your intimate heart with a “stupid” boy.

K. (small smile)

E. But, you know, we have talked about what “might have been” at 13. Elsewhere, we’ve said that, had we been a little more mature, we would have begun to study together, almost every night – in the small room, just off your mother’s kitchen. We would have wanted to prepare for our future, and become top students.

K. That’s such a wonderful vision.

E. Let me interject – I’m currently studying Troubadour poetry as a new project, as aid to better understanding The Wedding Song. And the central concept of their poetry was “fin’amor”.

ChatGPT explained the basics of it, but it didn’t make total sense to me – until today. I’m now seeing that in our “13” vision of studying together, developing ourselves, to shine as young people – this would have been our own personalized version of “fin’amor”.

K. This is sounding very interesting. I think I’m about to learn something important.

E. “Fin’amor” or “perfected love” in the world of twelfth century courtly romance was more than a guy wanting a beautiful girl. It was all that, but so much more. “Fin’amor” focused on the spiritual development of the lovers, it perfected their souls, it was an avenue of approach even to God.

K. And so, in our “vision” of “13” interactions, we wanted more than physical involvement. We wanted to become “perfected souls” in our love.

E. We specifically decided that, with high school coming up fast, we would not be the typical “going steady” teen couple spending their nights in a parked car. We would enjoy each other’s company as we became proficient in algebra and science.

K. This was very important to us. We made the conscious decision to delay physical intimacy in favor of developing our minds and souls.

E. And here’s the point I want to make: I have learned – as I’ve “tasted” this in my spirit – that there’s more than one kind of eroticism: there’s the

(1) “teens in the parked car” version of eros, and there’s also

(2) the “full package of engaging life" version of eros.

Now, some would say, this second item doesn’t sound like eros at all, it sounds “preppy” and more like two kids helping each other prepare for the SATs.

But here’s what I’ve found – to my shock! – when two kids, who love each other, decide to delay “parked car” intimacy and focus on developing the mind and the soul, there is an emergent sense – strange to say! – of eroticism that far, far transcends what the other kids experience in a parked car!

K. Now this is a fantastic realization. But – I feel it, too. And, Elenchus, this is what the Troubadours were so excited about in their songs and poetry! It’s something not just indescribably pleasurable, but profoundly unexpected, as well!

E. I think what this means is, “fin’amor” is meant to be the normal, cosmic way of living -- and this will create a special kind of high-minded erotic sensation, and it feels like eros! even though bodies-in-contact might be delayed; that is, “fin’amor” will take two lovers to higher heights of spirituality/pleasure/eros/self-development than what the parked-car kids could ever imagine.

K. I feel breathless about this new, clarifying view – and yet, in my heart of hearts, I’ve known this all along, but never made plain until your words here, Darling Dear.

E. Now, all this is a very round-about way of explaining some of my rationale for suggesting a possible name change for you.

K. That “new beautiful name” carries hidden meaning, hidden images, concerning these truths!

E. I can’t go into the details right now, but – that new name, for me, personifies two aspects of our own version of “fin’amor”. It is a woman's beautiful name that suggests to me

(1) extreme physical beauty and eroticism, along with

(2) the conscientious “preppy” girl, honor-student image -- the development of mind and soul.

To my view, a girl who embodies these represents the height of everything I could desire. There is nothing more, in receipt of this "full package".

K. (sighing) I can see that we have some things to discuss when we walk by the lake.

***************************

K. Elenchus, to state the obvious, your present – and insistent! – desire to “study all things” with me is nothing more than an updated version of “doing homework with the little neighbor girl every night.”

E. I thought I had it hidden so well.

K. Hidden in plain sight. We’ve not yet declared ourselves publicly, but no one will be less surprised than my mother. Granted – she would say – we did take our sweet time, and forever, to “strike our colors” for each other, with an infinite number of false flags, years of seeming non-interest, and outright hostility –

E. That’s no reason we can’t be friends.

K. Uh-huh. And when you visited her in later years, you always studiously avoided saying a word about me; which was most suspicious of all, a dead giveaway to her.

E. Revealed by what I did not say.

K. However – despite all our distractions and decoys… I believe she always knew there was something between us.

E. It was very impolite and rude of her not to inform me.

K. mmm… The whole family sort of knew… as usual, my favorite comatose friend was the last to know... but, if you would stop joking for a moment, to consider - is it not astonishing that, here we are, today, making plans to literally "do homework together on all subjects"? But this mature sentiment of yours, requiring my unabating presence in a cosmic search for the truth, began so early, just under the surface of personality, when stirrings of keener life caused a young boy to put away marbles and b-b gun.

E. It is more clear to me than ever, that -- there is something about you, more than a beautiful face -- that will not allow me to be truly happy in my quest for the truth ... or anything ... if you are not with me.

K. Dearest, maybe it's because -- more than that pretty face -- I am the truth to you.