|
home | what's new | other sites | contact | about |
||
|
Word Gems exploring self-realization, sacred personhood, and full humanity
Emily Dickinson Because I could not stop for Death —
Emily Dickinson (1830-1886)
Because I could not stop for Death – He kindly stopped for me – The Carriage held but just Ourselves – And Immortality. We slowly drove – He knew no haste And I had put away My labor and my leisure too, For His Civility – We passed the School, where Children strove At Recess – in the Ring – We passed the Fields of Gazing Grain – We passed the Setting Sun – Or rather – He passed Us – The Dews drew quivering and Chill – For only Gossamer, my Gown – My Tippet – only Tulle – We paused before a House that seemed A Swelling of the Ground – The Roof was scarcely visible – The Cornice – in the Ground – Since then – 'tis Centuries – and yet Feels shorter than the Day I first surmised the Horses' Heads Were toward Eternity –
from https://www.litcharts.com/poetry/emily-dickinson/because-i-could-not-stop-for-death "Because I could not stop for death" is one of Emily Dickinson's most celebrated poems and was composed around 1863. In the poem, a female speaker tells the story of how she was visited by "Death," personified as a "kindly" gentleman, and taken for a ride in his carriage. This ride appears to take the speaker past symbols of the different stages of life, before coming to a halt at what is most likely her own grave. The poem can be read both as the anticipation of a heavenly Christian afterlife and as something altogether more bleak and down-to-earth. Much of its power comes from its refusal to offer easy answers to life's greatest mystery: what happens when people die.
“Because I could not stop for death” is an exploration of both the inevitability of death and the uncertainties that surround what happens when people actually die. In the poem, a woman takes a ride with a personified “Death” in his carriage, by all likelihood heading towards her place in the afterlife. The poem’s matter-of-fact tone, which underplays the fantastical nature of what is happening, quickly establishes this journey as something beyond the speaker’s control. It's not clear if the speaker is already dead, or she is traveling towards death. Either way, her death is presented as something natural, strange, and inescapable. Indeed, the poem’s opening lines make this clear. The speaker herself couldn’t “stop for Death”—and not many people would—but “Death” has every intention of stopping for her. Notably, “Death” here is presented as something of a gentleman, “kindly” stopping his carriage so that the speaker can climb in. This suggests a certain comfort with, or at least acceptance of, dying on the part of the speaker, even as what this process actually entails remains mysterious. Also in the carriage is “Immortality.” It’s not clear if this is another personified figure—a kind of chaperone—or something more abstract. But the presence of “Immortality” does speak to one of humanity’s deepest questions: what happens when to people when they die? “Immortality” is ambiguous here. Its presence could support the Christian idea of the afterlife—which some critics feel runs throughout Dickinson’s poems. Or, by contrast, “Immortality” could be somewhat ironic, hinting at the permanent nothingness that awaits in death. Either way, such is the eternal inevitability of “Death” that he himself is in “no haste.” That is, he doesn’t need to hurry to make death happen, because it is an automatic fact of life. In fact, the whole journey has the air of unhurried purpose, as though reaching the destination is a given and that therefore rushing is unnecessary. The carriage stops by a school, fields, and perhaps even the speaker’s own grave (stanza five). These seem to represent different stages of life, starting from childhood and preceding—like the journey itself—to the inevitable final destination. To underscore the poem’s sense of awe surrounding the mysteries of death, the final stanza is filled with ambiguity and contradiction. The speaker explains that the carriage passed these sights “Centuries” ago, but that the entire time that has elapsed also feels “shorter than a Day.” In the grand scheme of eternity, hundreds of years might indeed feel like a blip on the radar. This contradiction thus highlights the difficulty of imagining eternity. Life is measured by time, moving through different stages as people age; people sense the story of their lives unfolding as time goes on. But in death, the perception of time—indeed, all perception—ceases to exist. Unless, of course, there is an afterlife, an idea which the poem seems open to but inconclusive about. Indeed, it’s in large part this inconclusiveness that makes the poem so powerful. On the one hand, “Death’s” kind and calm treatment of the woman could signal the comfort of a Christian afterlife—entrance to heaven and an eternity in God’s presence. But more darkly, the way that the poem plays with ideas of immortality and eternity can also be read as nothing more than the dark nothingness of death itself—that life, when it’s gone, is gone for good. In addition to looking at the mysteries of death, “Because I could not stop for death” comments on the nature of life. During the speaker’s journey with the personified “Death,” the points that they pass along the way seem charged with significance. The journey format of the poem mimics the way that life itself is a journey from birth to death—from the arrival of new life to its absence. The observations that the speaker makes along this journey seem to reinforce the idea that life and death are in cyclical balance; in a way, the poem suggests life is not possible without death. Firstly, though it is not an explicitly stated symbol in the poem, it’s important to bear in mind that this a journey taken with the aid of wheels. The carriage’s wheels are, of course, circular, gently hinting at the circular transformation from nothingness to life to nothingness once more. While the first two stanzas set up the journey itself, it’s from the third onwards that the speaker starts to notice the environment around her as it passes. The first point along the way is a school, “where Children strove / at Recess – in the Ring.” This image of children playing is important, symbolizing the continuation of life even after the speaker is no longer around to witness it (one of the facts that confronts everyone about death). The verb “strove” seems to suggest human effort, hinting at the way people strive to keep living even in the knowledge of inevitable death. The children are also playing in a “Ring,” the circular nature of which further reflects the cycle of life and death. Soon after, the traveling party goes by a field. While the sun is setting—representing the speaker’s death—the “Gazing Grain” seems to be growing strong. This, then, is another example of the continuation of life after death. Every year crops are harvested (representing death) and then are replanted or regrown, enacting the shift from life into death and back again. Then, in the penultimate stanza, the speaker seems to see her own grave. There is a sense here that the reality of death has arrived—that the speaker will no longer be around to witness children playing or crops growing. But because of the other sights that have been mentioned earlier, the grave visit doesn’t really feel as significant as one might expect. That is, the speaker herself will of course soon be gone, but the poem is charged with the knowledge that everything else will carry on as before. Perhaps her death even makes way for the continuation of life in her absence—for new children to “strive,” just as harvested grain makes way for new crops. Subtly, then, the poem suggests an interdependence between life and death. Both seem like necessary parts of the world as presented in the poem, even if their relationship is by its nature perplexing and intriguing. Dickinson manages to put into images the complexity of these thoughts, and intentionally leaves such questions unresolved for the reader to consider.
|
||
|
|
