|
Word Gems
exploring self-realization, sacred personhood, and full humanity
| It is generally known among Darwinists, but never discussed in a public forum, that modern biology is built upon a shaky foundation of unproven, dogmatic, materialistic assumptions. High school and college kids are not taught that biology is not a true science – not like chemistry and physics. |
return to "Evolution Controversy" contents page
Brian Goodwin, biologist, How The Leopard Got Its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity: “I don’t think biology at the moment is a science at all, at least in the sense that physics and chemistry are sciences. We need to know the universal ordering principles just as Newton provided them for the inanimate world.”
Most people view the evolution debate as a contest between modern science, laden with facts and empirical evidence, and religion, armed with only thread-bare traditions and out-of-date concepts.
In reality, both sides, much of the time, in their polemical statements, rely on unproven assumptions, mere guesswork, and wishful thinking.
“Every biologist must be painfully aware that biology is an incomplete science. It needs new organizing principles… Unfortunately it is not politically correct for a biologist to admit these shortcomings in public.” Dr. Amit Goswami, professor of quantum physics and writer of physics textbooks
|